... |
... |
@@ -14,50 +14,32 @@ |
14 |
14 |
((( |
15 |
15 |
(% class="col-xs-12 col-sm-8" %) |
16 |
16 |
((( |
17 |
|
-~= Texas Sex Offender Registry Race/Ethnicity Audit = |
18 |
|
-~{~{anchor name="texas-sex-offender-registry-race-ethnicity-audit"/}} |
|
17 |
+{{toc /}} |
19 |
19 |
|
20 |
|
-~== Overview == |
21 |
|
-On ~*~*September 9, 2023~*~*, Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime) published an in-depth analysis of the Texas Department of Public Safety’s sex offender registry, focusing on race and ethnicity misclassifications. The thread examines a database of 101,976 registrants and highlights systemic data errors that misrepresent non-White offenders as White. |
|
19 |
+= Texas Sex Offender Registry Race/Ethnicity Audit = {{anchor name=“texas-sex-offender-registry-race-ethnicity-audit”/}} |
22 |
22 |
|
23 |
|
-~== Data Collection == |
24 |
|
-~1. Downloaded the full Texas Sex Offender Registry: ~*~*101,976~*~* entries. |
25 |
|
-2. Queried the database to flag potential mismatches between surnames, self-reported race/ethnicity, and demographic patterns. |
26 |
|
-3. Used custom scripts to compute initial accuracy metrics. |
|
21 |
+== Overview == On **September 9, 2023**, Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime) published an in-depth analysis of the Texas Department of Public Safety’s sex offender registry, focusing on race and ethnicity misclassifications. The thread examines a database of 101,976 registrants and highlights systemic data errors that misrepresent non-White offenders as White. |
27 |
27 |
|
28 |
|
-~== Key Findings == |
29 |
|
-~1. ~*~*Raw Misclassification Counts~*~* |
30 |
|
- ~* Hispanics flagged as “Non-Hispanic White”: ~*~*11,541~*~* |
31 |
|
- ~* Blacks flagged as White: ~*~*92~*~* |
32 |
|
- ~* Asians flagged as White: ~*~*34~*~* |
33 |
|
- ~* Whites flagged as Black: ~*~*1~*~* |
|
23 |
+== Data Collection == 1. Downloaded the full Texas Sex Offender Registry: **101,976** entries.\\2. Queried the database to flag potential mismatches between surnames, self-reported race/ethnicity, and demographic patterns.\\3. Used custom scripts to compute initial accuracy metrics. |
34 |
34 |
|
35 |
|
-2. ~*~*Accuracy Metrics~*~* |
36 |
|
- ~* Initial accuracy: ~*~*89.48 %~*~*. |
37 |
|
- ~* After manual verification: ~*~*92.27 %~*~*. |
38 |
|
- ~* Remaining false positives to review: ~*~*2,590~*~*. |
|
25 |
+== Key Findings == 1. **Raw Misclassification Counts**\\* Hispanics flagged as “Non-Hispanic White”: **11,541**\\* Blacks flagged as White: **92**\\* Asians flagged as White: **34**\\* Whites flagged as Black: **1** |
39 |
39 |
|
40 |
|
-3. ~*~*Notable Examples~*~* |
41 |
|
- ~* Clusters of “Hernandez” surnames incorrectly marked as White. |
42 |
|
- ~* ~*~*Dequan~*~*, a documented Black offender, listed as “Non-Hispanic White.” |
43 |
|
- ~* ~*~*Louby Innocent~*~*, originally marked Black in Florida, appeared as White in Texas. |
|
27 |
+1. **Accuracy Metrics** |
|
28 |
+1*. Initial accuracy: **89.48 %**.\\ |
|
29 |
+1*. After manual verification: **92.27 %**.\\ |
|
30 |
+1*. Remaining false positives to review: **2,590**. |
|
31 |
+1. **Notable Examples** |
|
32 |
+1*. Clusters of “Hernandez” surnames incorrectly marked as White.\\ |
|
33 |
+1*. **Dequan**, a documented Black offender, listed as “Non-Hispanic White.”\\ |
|
34 |
+1*. **Louby Innocent**, originally marked Black in Florida, appeared as White in Texas. |
44 |
44 |
|
45 |
|
-~== Methodology == |
46 |
|
-~1. Automated surname-based queries to generate candidate mismatches. |
47 |
|
-2. Manual review of flagged entries by cross-referencing public DPS records. |
48 |
|
-3. Iterative re-runs to refine the matching algorithm and reduce false positives. |
|
36 |
+== Methodology == 1. Automated surname-based queries to generate candidate mismatches.\\2. Manual review of flagged entries by cross-referencing public DPS records.\\3. Iterative re-runs to refine the matching algorithm and reduce false positives. |
49 |
49 |
|
50 |
|
-~== Impact and Next Steps == |
51 |
|
-~1. Archived original registry entries to preserve evidence before corrections. |
52 |
|
-2. Planned release of a comprehensive spreadsheet with all verified entries and source links. |
53 |
|
-3. Recommendation: Texas DPS should implement routine data audits to ensure accurate race/ethnicity reporting. |
|
38 |
+== Impact and Next Steps == 1. Archived original registry entries to preserve evidence before corrections.\\2. Planned release of a comprehensive spreadsheet with all verified entries and source links.\\3. Recommendation: Texas DPS should implement routine data audits to ensure accurate race/ethnicity reporting. |
54 |
54 |
|
55 |
|
-~== References == |
56 |
|
-~{~{footnote reference="1"}}Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime). “Texas Sex Offender Registry Analysis!” Twitter thread, Sep 9, 2023. Available at ~[~[Thread Reader App>>https:~/~/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1700341490206310416]]~{~{/footnote}} |
57 |
|
-~{~{footnote reference="2"}}Texas Department of Public Safety. “Sex Offender Registry.” Available at ~[~[DPS Public Site>>https:~/~/publicsite.dps.texas.gov/SexOffenderRegistry]]~{~{/footnote}} |
|
40 |
+== References == {{footnote reference=“1”}}Unbiased Crime Report (@UnbiasedCrime). “Texas Sex Offender Registry Analysis!” Twitter thread, Sep 9, 2023. Available at [[Thread Reader App>>https:~/~/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1700341490206310416]]{{/footnote}}\\{{footnote reference=“2”}}Texas Department of Public Safety. “Sex Offender Registry.” Available at [[DPS Public Site>>https:~/~/publicsite.dps.texas.gov/SexOffenderRegistry]]{{/footnote}} |
58 |
58 |
|
59 |
|
-~{~{footnotes/}} |
60 |
|
- |
|
42 |
+{{footnotes/}} |
61 |
61 |
))) |
62 |
62 |
|
63 |
63 |
|