0 Votes

Changes for page Censorship and Media

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/09/15 11:22

From version 3.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/14 17:38
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 5.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/09/15 11:21
Change comment: Uploaded new attachment "FUUiEJ2bWJn5qbqv.mp4", version 1.1

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -Censorship & Media
1 +Censorship and Media
Content
... ... @@ -4,48 +4,303 @@
4 4  = Censorship and Media =
5 5  
6 6  == Overview ==
7 -This category examines the influence of media, the presence of bias, and the role of censorship in shaping public opinion. It delves into:
8 -- How narratives are crafted and controlled.
9 -- The mechanisms of selective reporting.
10 -- The broader societal consequences of these trends.
11 11  
12 -== Subcategories ==
8 +The intersection of {{tooltip label="censorship" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of speech, public communication, or other information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient by governments, media outlets, or other controlling bodies.{{/tooltip}} and {{tooltip label="media bias" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Media bias is the perceived bias of journalists and news producers within the mass media in the selection of events and stories that are reported and how they are covered.{{/tooltip}} represents one of the most critical challenges to {{tooltip label="free speech" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Free speech is the principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction.{{/tooltip}} and democratic discourse in the modern era. This category examines the systematic manipulation of information, the suppression of dissenting voices, and the role of media institutions in shaping public perception through selective reporting, narrative control, and ideological filtering.
13 13  
14 -=== [[Media Bias and Representation]] ===
15 -- Analyses of biased reporting and selective coverage in mainstream and independent media.
16 -- Case studies of media misrepresentation of specific groups, events, or phenomena.
17 -- Statistical reviews of bias in reporting across various media platforms.
10 +The scope of this analysis encompasses traditional media outlets, social media platforms, academic institutions, and government agencies that engage in various forms of information control. We investigate how these entities work individually and collectively to suppress certain viewpoints while amplifying others, often under the guise of protecting public safety, preventing "misinformation," or maintaining social harmony.
18 18  
19 -=== [[Freedom of Speech and Censorship]] ===
20 -- Examples of censorship in traditional media, social media, and academic institutions.
21 -- Discussions on balancing free speech with content regulation in the digital age.
22 -- Legal and ethical implications of suppressing dissenting voices.
12 +== Historical Context ==
23 23  
24 -=== [[Cultural Narratives in Entertainment]] ===
25 -- Exploration of the portrayal of social, racial, and political themes in movies, television, and literature.
26 -- Analyses of trends in entertainment media and their role in shaping societal perceptions.
27 -- Critiques of ideological narratives embedded in modern storytelling.
14 +The manipulation of information and suppression of dissenting voices is not a new phenomenon, but the digital age has fundamentally transformed both the scale and sophistication of these practices. Throughout history, those in power have sought to control the narrative, from ancient rulers burning books to modern governments implementing sophisticated surveillance and censorship systems.
28 28  
29 -== Suggestions for Content ==
16 +In the 20th century, we witnessed the rise of {{tooltip label="propaganda" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Propaganda is communication that is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis or perception.{{/tooltip}} as a tool of state control, with regimes like Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union developing elaborate systems of information manipulation. However, the post-World War II era saw the emergence of more subtle forms of media control, often operating under the banner of "professional journalism" and "editorial standards."
30 30  
31 -=== Media Bias and Representation ===
32 -- Compilation of biased news headlines and analysis of their framing.
33 -- Investigation into selective coverage and omission of significant stories.
34 -- Data-driven evaluation of media ownership and its influence on reporting.
18 +The digital revolution of the late 20th and early 21st centuries created new opportunities for both information dissemination and control. While the internet initially promised to democratize information access, it also provided powerful new tools for surveillance, manipulation, and censorship. Social media platforms, search engines, and content recommendation algorithms have become the new gatekeepers of information, wielding unprecedented influence over what people see, think, and believe.
35 35  
36 -=== Freedom of Speech and Censorship ===
37 -- Examples of censorship policies on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.
38 -- Historical overview of high-profile cases involving media censorship.
39 -- Philosophical and legal debates about the boundaries of free speech.
20 +== Media Bias and Representation ==
40 40  
41 -=== Cultural Narratives in Entertainment ===
42 -- Reviews of films, books, or shows that reflect cultural or political narratives.
43 -- Case studies on entertainment media's role in perpetuating stereotypes or biases.
44 -- Discussions on the implications of dominant cultural narratives in media.
22 +=== Systematic Bias in News Reporting ===
45 45  
46 -== Call to Action ==
47 -Contributors are encouraged to:
48 -- Identify real-world examples of bias and censorship in media and entertainment.
49 -- Share evidence-based critiques of media narratives and their societal impacts.
50 -- Analyze the intersection of free speech, regulation, and censorship in modern contexts.
24 +Mainstream media outlets consistently demonstrate systematic bias in their reporting, often through subtle mechanisms that shape public perception without appearing overtly partisan. This bias manifests in several key ways:
51 51  
26 +**Selection Bias:** Media outlets systematically choose which stories to cover and which to ignore, often based on ideological considerations rather than newsworthiness. Stories that challenge prevailing narratives or expose uncomfortable truths about favored groups or policies are frequently {{tooltip label="spiked" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}Spiking refers to the practice of killing or suppressing a news story, often for editorial or political reasons.{{/tooltip}} or buried, while stories that support the preferred narrative receive extensive coverage.
27 +
28 +**Framing and Language:** The way stories are framed and the language used to describe events can significantly influence public perception. For example, the same event might be described as "protesters" versus "rioters," "freedom fighters" versus "terrorists," or "undocumented immigrants" versus "illegal aliens," depending on the outlet's ideological leanings.
29 +
30 +**Source Selection:** Media outlets often rely on a narrow range of sources that share their worldview, creating an echo chamber effect. Alternative perspectives and expert opinions that challenge the dominant narrative are frequently excluded or marginalized.
31 +
32 +=== Case Studies of Media Misrepresentation ===
33 +
34 +**The Covington Catholic Incident (2019):** A prime example of media bias occurred when major outlets initially misreported an encounter between Covington Catholic students and Native American activist Nathan Phillips. The media narrative portrayed the students as aggressors, but later video evidence showed the opposite. Despite this correction, the initial false narrative had already shaped public opinion and caused lasting damage to the students' reputations.
35 +
36 +**The Hunter Biden Laptop Story (2020):** Major media outlets, including Twitter and Facebook, suppressed reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop, claiming it was "Russian disinformation" without proper investigation. This suppression occurred just weeks before a presidential election and may have influenced the outcome. The story was later verified as legitimate, but the damage to public discourse was already done.
37 +
38 +**COVID-19 Coverage:** Throughout the pandemic, media outlets consistently promoted certain narratives while suppressing others, often based on political considerations rather than scientific evidence. Alternative treatments, early treatment protocols, and questions about lockdown effectiveness were frequently dismissed or censored.
39 +
40 +=== Statistical Analysis of Media Bias ===
41 +
42 +Studies have consistently shown that mainstream media outlets exhibit significant bias in their coverage. A 2019 study by the Media Research Center found that 92% of network news coverage of President Trump was negative, compared to 7% positive. This level of negativity far exceeded coverage of previous presidents and suggests systematic bias rather than objective reporting.
43 +
44 +The {{tooltip label="Hofstra University study" event="click" style="width: 320px; text-align: left;"}}A 2014 study by Hofstra University found that 90% of journalists identify as liberal, while only 7% identify as conservative.{{/tooltip}} revealed that 90% of journalists identify as liberal, while only 7% identify as conservative. This dramatic imbalance in political orientation among media professionals inevitably influences the content they produce and the stories they choose to cover.
45 +
46 +== Freedom of Speech and Censorship ==
47 +
48 +=== Traditional Media Censorship ===
49 +
50 +Traditional media outlets engage in various forms of censorship, often under the guise of editorial discretion or professional standards. This includes:
51 +
52 +**Editorial Censorship:** Editors and producers regularly kill stories that don't align with their ideological preferences or that might offend advertisers or powerful interests. This form of censorship is often invisible to the public, as rejected stories simply don't appear.
53 +
54 +**Self-Censorship:** Journalists and content creators often engage in self-censorship, avoiding certain topics or perspectives out of fear of professional consequences, social ostracism, or career damage.
55 +
56 +**Corporate Censorship:** Media corporations, particularly those with significant advertising revenue, often avoid covering stories that might offend major advertisers or business partners.
57 +
58 +=== Social Media Censorship ===
59 +
60 +Social media platforms have become the new public square, but they also serve as powerful tools of censorship and information control. These platforms engage in various forms of content suppression:
61 +
62 +**Shadow Banning:** Users' content is hidden from their followers' feeds without notification, effectively silencing them while maintaining the appearance of free speech.
63 +
64 +**Algorithm Manipulation:** Content recommendation algorithms are designed to promote certain viewpoints while suppressing others, often without transparency about how these decisions are made.
65 +
66 +**Fact-Checking and Misinformation Policies:** Platforms use "fact-checking" organizations with their own ideological biases to determine what constitutes "misinformation," leading to the suppression of legitimate alternative viewpoints.
67 +
68 +**Deplatforming:** Users who express unpopular or controversial opinions are permanently banned from platforms, effectively removing them from public discourse.
69 +
70 +=== Academic Censorship ===
71 +
72 +Universities and academic institutions, once bastions of free inquiry and debate, have increasingly become centers of censorship and ideological conformity. This includes:
73 +
74 +**Cancel Culture:** Students and faculty who express dissenting views face harassment, job loss, and social ostracism.
75 +
76 +**Speech Codes:** Universities implement policies that restrict certain types of speech, often under the guise of creating "safe spaces" or preventing "hate speech."
77 +
78 +**Research Suppression:** Academic research that challenges prevailing narratives or produces politically inconvenient results faces funding cuts, publication barriers, and professional consequences.
79 +
80 +**Speaker Bans:** Universities prevent controversial speakers from appearing on campus, limiting exposure to diverse viewpoints.
81 +
82 +=== Government Censorship ===
83 +
84 +Government agencies engage in various forms of censorship, both overt and covert:
85 +
86 +**Direct Censorship:** Governments directly suppress information through legal mechanisms, such as gag orders, classified information designations, and national security justifications.
87 +
88 +**Indirect Censorship:** Government agencies pressure private companies to suppress certain content through regulatory threats, funding conditions, or informal pressure.
89 +
90 +**Surveillance and Intimidation:** Government surveillance of journalists and activists creates a chilling effect that discourages certain types of reporting and commentary.
91 +
92 +**Media Capture:** Governments influence media coverage through ownership, funding, or regulatory control of media outlets.
93 +
94 +== Cultural Narratives in Entertainment ==
95 +
96 +=== Hollywood and Narrative Control ===
97 +
98 +The entertainment industry plays a crucial role in shaping cultural narratives and public perception. Hollywood, in particular, has become a powerful tool for promoting certain ideologies while suppressing others:
99 +
100 +**Representation Politics:** The entertainment industry has embraced identity politics, often prioritizing representation over artistic merit or storytelling quality. This has led to the creation of content that serves ideological purposes rather than entertainment value.
101 +
102 +**Historical Revisionism:** Films and television shows frequently present historically inaccurate narratives that serve contemporary political purposes, such as portraying historical figures in ways that align with current ideological trends.
103 +
104 +**Message Films:** Many modern films prioritize delivering political messages over entertainment, often at the expense of storytelling and character development.
105 +
106 +=== Literature and Publishing ===
107 +
108 +The publishing industry has also become increasingly politicized, with certain viewpoints being promoted while others are suppressed:
109 +
110 +**Editorial Bias:** Publishers and editors often reject manuscripts that don't align with their ideological preferences, regardless of literary merit.
111 +
112 +**Award Systems:** Literary awards and recognition systems have become politicized, with works being judged more on their political content than their artistic value.
113 +
114 +**Book Bans and Suppression:** While much attention is focused on "book bans" in schools and libraries, there is also systematic suppression of certain types of literature in mainstream publishing.
115 +
116 +=== Music and Cultural Expression ===
117 +
118 +The music industry has also been affected by ideological pressures:
119 +
120 +**Platform Suppression:** Music streaming platforms and radio stations suppress certain artists or songs based on their political content or the artist's personal views.
121 +
122 +**Award Manipulation:** Music awards and recognition systems have become politicized, with artists being judged on their political stances rather than their musical talent.
123 +
124 +**Cultural Appropriation Debates:** Discussions about cultural appropriation have been used to suppress certain types of artistic expression and cultural exchange.
125 +
126 +== The Role of Technology in Information Control ==
127 +
128 +=== Algorithmic Censorship ===
129 +
130 +Modern technology has created new and sophisticated methods of information control:
131 +
132 +**Search Engine Manipulation:** Search engines can manipulate results to promote certain viewpoints while suppressing others, often without users being aware of this manipulation.
133 +
134 +**Social Media Algorithms:** Social media platforms use complex algorithms to determine what content users see, often promoting content that aligns with the platform's ideological preferences.
135 +
136 +**Recommendation Systems:** Content recommendation systems on platforms like YouTube, Netflix, and Amazon can be manipulated to promote certain types of content while suppressing others.
137 +
138 +=== Artificial Intelligence and Content Moderation ===
139 +
140 +AI systems are increasingly being used to moderate content and determine what constitutes acceptable speech:
141 +
142 +**Automated Censorship:** AI systems automatically flag and remove content based on algorithms that may contain built-in biases.
143 +
144 +**Bias in AI Training:** AI systems trained on biased datasets will inevitably produce biased results, leading to the systematic suppression of certain viewpoints.
145 +
146 +**Lack of Transparency:** The decision-making processes of AI content moderation systems are often opaque, making it difficult to understand why certain content is suppressed.
147 +
148 +=== Surveillance and Data Collection ===
149 +
150 +Modern technology enables unprecedented levels of surveillance and data collection:
151 +
152 +**Mass Surveillance:** Government and corporate surveillance systems collect vast amounts of data about individuals' online activities, creating detailed profiles that can be used for various purposes.
153 +
154 +**Behavioral Manipulation:** The data collected through surveillance can be used to manipulate individuals' behavior and opinions through targeted content and advertising.
155 +
156 +**Predictive Policing:** Surveillance data is increasingly being used for predictive policing and other forms of social control.
157 +
158 +== Economic Factors and Media Control ==
159 +
160 +=== Corporate Ownership and Control ===
161 +
162 +The concentration of media ownership in the hands of a few large corporations has created significant concerns about information control:
163 +
164 +**Media Monopolies:** A small number of corporations control most major media outlets, leading to homogenized content and limited diversity of viewpoints.
165 +
166 +**Cross-Media Ownership:** The same corporations that own media outlets also own other industries, creating conflicts of interest that can influence coverage.
167 +
168 +**International Ownership:** Foreign entities own significant portions of the media landscape, potentially influencing coverage to serve their own interests.
169 +
170 +=== Advertising and Revenue Dependencies ===
171 +
172 +Media outlets' dependence on advertising revenue creates additional pressures that can influence content:
173 +
174 +**Advertiser Pressure:** Advertisers can pressure media outlets to avoid certain topics or perspectives that might be controversial.
175 +
176 +**Revenue Optimization:** Media outlets may prioritize content that generates the most revenue over content that serves the public interest.
177 +
178 +**Sponsored Content:** The line between editorial content and advertising has become increasingly blurred, with sponsored content often appearing as legitimate news.
179 +
180 +=== Government Funding and Influence ===
181 +
182 +Government funding of media outlets and content creators can create dependencies that influence coverage:
183 +
184 +**Public Broadcasting:** Government-funded media outlets may be influenced by political considerations in their coverage.
185 +
186 +**Grants and Subsidies:** Government grants and subsidies to media organizations can create dependencies that influence content.
187 +
188 +**Regulatory Pressure:** Government regulatory agencies can pressure media outlets through various mechanisms to influence their coverage.
189 +
190 +== International Perspectives on Censorship ==
191 +
192 +=== Authoritarian Regimes ===
193 +
194 +Many authoritarian regimes engage in systematic censorship and information control:
195 +
196 +**China's Great Firewall:** China has implemented one of the most sophisticated internet censorship systems in the world, blocking access to foreign websites and social media platforms.
197 +
198 +**Russia's Media Control:** Russia has established tight control over its media landscape, with most major outlets either state-owned or heavily influenced by the government.
199 +
200 +**Iran's Internet Restrictions:** Iran has implemented various restrictions on internet access and social media platforms.
201 +
202 +=== Democratic Nations ===
203 +
204 +Even in democratic nations, there are concerns about censorship and information control:
205 +
206 +**European Union Regulations:** The EU has implemented various regulations that some argue constitute censorship, such as the "right to be forgotten" and content moderation requirements.
207 +
208 +**Canada's Online Harms Act:** Canada has proposed legislation that critics argue could lead to censorship of legitimate speech.
209 +
210 +**Australia's News Media Bargaining Code:** Australia has implemented legislation that requires tech companies to pay news outlets for content, which some argue could influence coverage.
211 +
212 +== The Future of Free Speech ==
213 +
214 +=== Emerging Technologies ===
215 +
216 +New technologies present both opportunities and challenges for free speech:
217 +
218 +**Blockchain and Decentralization:** Blockchain technology offers the potential for decentralized platforms that are more resistant to censorship.
219 +
220 +**Encrypted Communication:** End-to-end encryption provides tools for private communication that are more difficult to monitor and censor.
221 +
222 +**Alternative Platforms:** New platforms are emerging that promise to be more resistant to censorship and ideological bias.
223 +
224 +=== Legal and Regulatory Developments ===
225 +
226 +Legal and regulatory frameworks are evolving in ways that could significantly impact free speech:
227 +
228 +**Section 230 Reform:** There are ongoing discussions about reforming Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides liability protection for online platforms.
229 +
230 +**Hate Speech Legislation:** Various jurisdictions are considering or implementing hate speech legislation that could impact free speech.
231 +
232 +**Privacy Regulations:** Privacy regulations like GDPR can have unintended consequences for free speech and information access.
233 +
234 +=== Grassroots Resistance ===
235 +
236 +Despite the challenges, there are signs of resistance to censorship and information control:
237 +
238 +**Alternative Media:** Independent media outlets and content creators are emerging to provide alternative perspectives.
239 +
240 +**Decentralized Platforms:** New decentralized platforms are being developed that are more resistant to censorship.
241 +
242 +**Public Awareness:** There is growing public awareness of censorship and media bias, leading to increased demand for alternative sources of information.
243 +
244 +== Recommendations for Reform ==
245 +
246 +=== Media Reform ===
247 +
248 +To address media bias and censorship, several reforms are necessary:
249 +
250 +**Diversity of Ownership:** Policies should promote diversity of media ownership to prevent concentration of control in the hands of a few corporations.
251 +
252 +**Transparency Requirements:** Media outlets should be required to disclose their ownership, funding sources, and potential conflicts of interest.
253 +
254 +**Editorial Independence:** Measures should be implemented to protect editorial independence from corporate and political influence.
255 +
256 +=== Platform Regulation ===
257 +
258 +Social media platforms and other tech companies should be subject to appropriate regulation:
259 +
260 +**Transparency in Content Moderation:** Platforms should be required to provide transparency about their content moderation practices and decision-making processes.
261 +
262 +**Appeal Processes:** Users should have meaningful appeal processes when their content is removed or their accounts are suspended.
263 +
264 +**Algorithmic Transparency:** Platforms should be required to provide transparency about how their algorithms work and what factors influence content visibility.
265 +
266 +=== Legal Protections ===
267 +
268 +Stronger legal protections for free speech are necessary:
269 +
270 +**First Amendment Protection:** The First Amendment should be vigorously defended and expanded to cover new forms of communication.
271 +
272 +**Anti-SLAPP Laws:** Stronger anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) laws should be implemented to protect against frivolous lawsuits designed to silence critics.
273 +
274 +**Whistleblower Protection:** Stronger protections for whistleblowers and journalists who expose wrongdoing.
275 +
276 +== Conclusion ==
277 +
278 +The challenges to free speech and information access in the modern era are unprecedented in their scope and sophistication. The combination of corporate media consolidation, technological surveillance, and ideological conformity has created a system that systematically suppresses certain viewpoints while promoting others. This represents a fundamental threat to democratic discourse and the free exchange of ideas that is essential for a functioning society.
279 +
280 +However, there are also reasons for hope. The same technologies that enable censorship and surveillance also provide tools for resistance and alternative communication. The growing awareness of these issues among the public has created momentum for reform and change. The future of free speech will depend on our ability to recognize these challenges, develop effective responses, and maintain our commitment to the principles of open discourse and intellectual freedom.
281 +
282 +The stakes could not be higher. In a world where information is power, those who control the flow of information control the future. We must remain vigilant in defending free speech and ensuring that all voices have the opportunity to be heard, regardless of how unpopular or controversial their views may be. The alternative is a world where only approved narratives are allowed to flourish, and dissenting voices are silenced before they can even be heard.
283 +
284 +== Sources and Further Reading ==
285 +
286 +1. **Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky.** //Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.// Pantheon Books, 1988.
287 +
288 +2. **Lukianoff, Greg, and Jonathan Haidt.** //The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure.// Penguin Press, 2018.
289 +
290 +3. **Taibbi, Matt.** //Hate Inc.: Why Today's Media Makes Us Despise One Another.// OR Books, 2019.
291 +
292 +4. **Weiss, Bari.** //How to Fight Anti-Semitism.// Crown, 2019.
293 +
294 +5. **Goldberg, Bernard.** //Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News.// Regnery Publishing, 2001.
295 +
296 +6. **Coulter, Ann.** //Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right.// Crown Forum, 2002.
297 +
298 +7. **Horowitz, David.** //The Art of Political War and Other Radical Pursuits.// Spence Publishing Company, 2000.
299 +
300 +8. **Shapiro, Ben.** //The Right Side of History: How Reason and Moral Purpose Made the West Great.// Broadside Books, 2019.
301 +
302 +9. **Sowell, Thomas.** //Intellectuals and Society.// Basic Books, 2009.
303 +
304 +10. **Murray, Douglas.** //The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity.// Bloomsbury Continuum, 2019.
305 +
306 +{{putFootnotes/}}
FUUiEJ2bWJn5qbqv.mp4
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +4.0 MB
Content
XWiki.DocumentSheetBinding[0]
XWiki.GadgetClass[0]
content
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,0 @@
1 -{{velocity}}
2 -#set ($extraParams = '')
3 -#if ($doc.space != 'Main')
4 - #set ($escapedDocumentReference = $services.rendering.escape($services.model.serialize($doc.documentReference,
5 - 'default'), 'xwiki/2.1'))
6 - #set ($extraParams = "root='document:$escapedDocumentReference'")
7 -#end
8 -{{documentTree showTranslations="false" showAttachments="false" $extraParams /}}
9 -{{/velocity}}
position
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1,1
title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -#if ($doc.space == 'Main')$services.localization.render('platform.dashboard.wiki.pages')#{else}$services.localization.render('platform.dashboard.space.documents', [$doc.plainTitle])#end
XWiki.GadgetClass[1]
content
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@
1 -{{velocity}}
2 -#set($tagSpace = $NULL)
3 -#if ($doc.space != "Main")
4 - #set($tagSpace = $services.rendering.escape($doc.space, 'xwiki/2.1'))
5 -#end
6 -
7 -{{tagcloud space="$!tagSpace" /}}
8 -{{/velocity}}
position
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1,2
title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -$services.localization.render('platform.dashboard.space.tagcloud', [$doc.plainTitle])
XWiki.GadgetClass[2]
content
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@
1 -{{velocity}}
2 -#set($aSpace = $NULL)
3 -#if ($doc.space != "Main")
4 - #set ($aSpace = $services.rendering.escape($doc.space, 'xwiki/2.1'))
5 -#end
6 -
7 -{{notifications spaces="$!aSpace" useUserPreferences="false" displayOwnEvents="true" /}}
8 -{{/velocity}}
position
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2,1
title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -#if ($doc.space != 'Main')$services.localization.render('platform.dashboard.space.activity', [$doc.plainTitle])#{else}$services.localization.render('platform.dashboard.wiki.activity')#end