... |
... |
@@ -264,72 +264,46 @@ |
264 |
264 |
{{example}} |
265 |
265 |
|
266 |
266 |
|
267 |
|
-{{expandable summary="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}} |
268 |
|
-**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)* |
269 |
|
-**Date of Publication:** *2013* |
270 |
|
-**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.* |
271 |
|
-**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"* |
272 |
|
-**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54) |
273 |
|
-**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* |
|
267 |
+{{expandable summary="🧠 Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence"}} |
|
268 |
+**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)* |
|
269 |
+**Date:** *2019* |
|
270 |
+**Authors:** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle* |
|
271 |
+**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406) |
|
272 |
+**Subject:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research* |
274 |
274 |
|
275 |
275 |
{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} |
276 |
|
-1. **General Observations:** |
277 |
|
- - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**. |
278 |
|
- - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**. |
279 |
|
- |
280 |
|
-2. **Subgroup Analysis:** |
281 |
|
- - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**. |
282 |
|
- - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**. |
283 |
|
- |
284 |
|
-3. **Other Significant Data Points:** |
285 |
|
- - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings. |
286 |
|
- - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**. |
|
275 |
+- Survey of **102 intelligence experts** |
|
276 |
+- **90% from Western countries**, **83% male** |
|
277 |
+- **54% left-liberal**, **24% conservative** |
|
278 |
+- **50/50 split** on genetic vs environmental causes of Black-White IQ gap |
287 |
287 |
{{/expandable}} |
288 |
288 |
|
289 |
289 |
{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} |
290 |
|
-1. **Primary Observations:** |
291 |
|
- - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models. |
292 |
|
- - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**. |
293 |
|
- |
294 |
|
-2. **Subgroup Trends:** |
295 |
|
- - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**. |
296 |
|
- - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**. |
297 |
|
- |
298 |
|
-3. **Specific Case Analysis:** |
299 |
|
- - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age. |
300 |
|
- - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**. |
|
282 |
+- Support for **g-factor theory** |
|
283 |
+- Agreement on **heritability of intelligence** |
|
284 |
+- Political lean: left = environmental, right = genetic causes |
301 |
301 |
{{/expandable}} |
302 |
302 |
|
303 |
|
-{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} |
304 |
|
-1. **Strengths of the Study:** |
305 |
|
- - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**. |
306 |
|
- - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence. |
307 |
|
- |
308 |
|
-2. **Limitations of the Study:** |
309 |
|
- - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability. |
310 |
|
- - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time. |
311 |
|
- |
312 |
|
-3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** |
313 |
|
- - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**. |
314 |
|
- - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency. |
|
287 |
+{{expandable summary="📝 Critique"}} |
|
288 |
+- Largest expert survey on intelligence |
|
289 |
+- **Western-only sample**, possible **self-selection bias** |
315 |
315 |
{{/expandable}} |
316 |
316 |
|
317 |
|
-{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} |
318 |
|
-- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**. |
319 |
|
-- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**. |
320 |
|
-- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**. |
|
292 |
+{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance"}} |
|
293 |
+- Shows **ideological divide** in science |
|
294 |
+- Highlights **media vs expert disconnect** |
321 |
321 |
{{/expandable}} |
322 |
322 |
|
323 |
|
-{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} |
324 |
|
-1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**. |
325 |
|
-2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**. |
326 |
|
-3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**. |
|
297 |
+{{expandable summary="🔍 Explore More"}} |
|
298 |
+- Global surveys on intelligence beliefs |
|
299 |
+- Media analysis follow-up studies |
327 |
327 |
{{/expandable}} |
328 |
328 |
|
329 |
|
-{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} |
330 |
|
-[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]] |
|
302 |
+{{expandable summary="📄 Download"}} |
|
303 |
+[[Download Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]] |
331 |
331 |
{{/expandable}} |
332 |
332 |
{{/expandable}} |
|
306 |
+{{/example}} |
333 |
333 |
|
334 |
334 |
|
335 |
335 |
== See Also: == |